Scriptural context
What verse 2.47 is doing in Chapter 2
Bhagavad Gita 2.47 appears in Krishna’s instruction to Arjuna during the long second chapter. The immediate sequence has already turned from Arjuna’s collapse at the prospect of battle toward disciplined understanding and action. This verse does not stand alone as a slogan about productivity. Its final clause — the warning against attachment to inaction — is part of the verse itself and is essential to reading it as a whole.
For a reference library, that context changes how the verse should be presented. A short motivational paraphrase can preserve the first half while accidentally dropping the second half. SlokaSandra therefore keeps the complete Sanskrit text visible, gives the source location as Bhagavad Gita 2.47, and separates a plain-language rendering from traditional commentary. Readers can see where the text ends and where explanation begins.
The verse also sits next to 2.48, which develops the instruction through steadiness in success and failure. That nearby context is one reason many teachers connect 2.47 with the Gita’s larger treatment of disciplined action. This page does not claim that every Vedanta tradition interprets the verse identically. It records a shared textual center and then points readers toward named commentarial sources for tradition-specific reading.
Learn carefully
Break the verse into four sense units
- कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्तेkarmaṇy evādhikāras te
- मा फलेषु कदाचनmā phaleṣu kadācana
- मा कर्मफलहेतुर्भूःmā karmaphalahetur bhūḥ
- मा ते सङ्गोऽस्त्वकर्मणिmā te saṅgo ’stv akarmaṇi
Audio status: awaiting verified recitation.No recitation is published on this page yet. SlokaSandra will not label generated or unreviewed pronunciation as authoritative. When verified audio is added, it will remain an in-site listening experience rather than a download feature.
Different commentarial frameworks, a shared warning against fruit-driven action and inaction
The Sanskrit Wikisource transcription of Ramanuja’s commentary presents 2.47 in the context of the aspirant’s duty: action is to be performed without claiming its fruits, and the absence of a claim to fruit must not become attachment to non-performance. The commentary’s theological and soteriological framing belongs to Ramanuja’s tradition and should be read as such.
The Wikisource edition containing Madhusudana Saraswati’s Gūḍhārthadīpikā and Śrīdhara Svami’s notes also prints the verse and explains the rejection of fruit-desire together with the rejection of attachment to not acting. Those commentaries frame the teaching through their own concepts and are not interchangeable with Ramanuja’s reading. SlokaSandra uses them here to show that the page’s basic contextual warning is source-grounded without pretending there is only one traditional interpretation.